Cannabis for Anxiety and Mood Disorders
Quick Links: Latest Report | Visual Abstract | Summary | Publication History
Latest Report
The latest surveillance report was published in July 2026; the last full review was published in August 2025.
Download visual abstract PDF
Summary
Cannabis for Anxiety and Mood Disorders: Living Systematic Review
Background
- Anxiety and mood disorders (depressive disorders and bipolar disorder) are common in the US.
- People with anxiety and mood disorders may use cannabis for many reasons, yet its efficacy and safety for these conditions is unknown.
- This review aims to examine the evidence on the effectiveness of cannabis for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorders.
Methods
Living systematic review
Search (updated: February 2023 to May 2025):
- Ovid MEDLINE ALL
- PsycINFO
- CENTRAL
- ClinialTrials.gov
Screening: Studies (controlled clinical trials and observational studies with comparison groups) assessed the effects of plant-based cannabis preparations; whole-plant extracts (e.g., nabiximols); or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved synthesized, pharmaceutically prepared cannabinoids (e.g., dronabinol, nabilone) in adults with a diagnosis of anxiety or mood disorder. Minimum 4 weeks of follow-up.
Risk of Bias (RoB): Tool adapted from those used by national organizations, including SIGN, NICE and the National Heart‚ Lung‚ and Blood Institute.
GRADE: Overall certainty of evidence (CoE) for each outcome was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach
Updates: Search to be updated at regular intervals
Findings
- We included 14 studies.
- We also identified 6 ongoing studies on this topic.
Anxiety disorders (5 studies)
- Cannabidiol (CBD)
- CBD may be associated with improvements in anxiety, depression, and other anxiety-related symptoms (low-certainty evidence).
- It is unclear from the available evidence whether CBD impacts functioning or safety (very low certainty evidence).
- No evidence for health care utilization.
- Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
- It is unclear from the available evidence whether THC impacts anxiety symptoms or safety (very low certainty evidence)
- No evidence for quality of life (QoL) and functioning, or health care utilization.
Depressive disorders (1 study)
- Cannabis use (THC vs CBD not assessed)
- It is unclear from the available evidence whether cannabis use impacts depression symptoms, QoL or functioning, or healthcare utilization.
Bipolar disorders (8 studies)
- CBD
- It is unclear from the available evidence whether CBD impacts depression symptom control and safety in patients with bipolar disorder.
- No evidence for CBD and quality of life and functioning, or health care utilization.
- Cannabis use (THC vs CBD not specified)
- There is consistent evidence across nonrandomized studies that cannabis use may be associated with increased risk of mania and other bipolar-related symptoms, as well as poorer disease outcomes, such as recovery and remission (low-certainty evidence).
- It is unclear from the available evidence whether cannabis use impacts quality of life and functioning, and health care utilization.
- No evidence for safety.
Summary of Findings (GRADE)
| Outcome Number of Studies Sample Size |
CoE | Relationship | Rationale for CoE Rating |
| Anxiety disorders | |||
| Exposure: CBD (low or no THC) | |||
| Symptom control 3 RCTs, and 1 quasi-experimental study N = 659 |
●●◌◌ Low |
Use of CBD was associated with improvements in anxiety, depression, and other anxiety-related symptoms | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB and indirectness (i.e., limited populations) |
| Quality of life and functioning 1 RCT N = 178 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
CBD use was associated with improved functioning compared to placebo | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, imprecision (i.e., small sample sizes or not assessable), and indirectness (i.e., limited populations) |
| Health care utilization | No evidence | ||
| Safety 2 RCTs N = 258 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No association between the use of CBD and AEs | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, inconsistency (i.e., mixed results) and indirectness (i.e., limited populations) |
| Exposure: THC (from whole plant or synthesized [e.g. nabilone], with or without CBD) | |||
| Symptom control 1 CCT, and 1 quasi-experimental study N = 381 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
Mixed findings for use of THC and anxiety symptoms | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, inconsistency (i.e., mixed results) and indirectness (i.e., limited populations) |
| Quality of life and functioning | No evidence | ||
| Health care utilization | No evidence | ||
| Safety 1 CCT N = 20 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No association between the use of nabilone and AEs | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, imprecision (i.e., small sample sizes or not assessable), and indirectness (i.e., limited populations) |
| Depressive disorders | |||
| Exposure: Cannabis use (THC vs CBD not assessed) | |||
| Symptom control 1 NRS N = 2,577 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No association between cannabis use and remission from MDD. Higher levels of cannabis use (i.e., CUD) were associated with significantly higher levels of depression |
Downgraded 1 level for indirectness (i.e., NRS with a population using cannabis, but not clear if using for depression specifically)a |
| Quality of life and functioning 1 NRS N = 2,577 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No associations between cannabis use and suicidality, functionality, and quality of life in people with MDD | Downgraded 1 level for indirectness (i.e., NRS with a population using cannabis, but not clear if using for depression specifically)a |
| Health care utilization 1 NRS N = 2,577 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No association between cannabis use and health care utilization | Downgraded 1 level for indirectness (i.e., NRS with a population using cannabis, but not clear if using for depression specifically)a |
| Safety | No evidence | ||
| Bipolar disorders | |||
| Exposure: CBD | |||
| Symptom control 1 RCT N = 35 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No difference between CBD and placebo for depression, response or remission rates, or mania | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, imprecision (i.e., small sample size), and indirectness (i.e., limited population) |
| Quality of life and functioning | No evidence | ||
| Health care utilization | No evidence | ||
| Safety 1 RCT N = 35 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
No difference between CBD and placebo for AEs | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB, imprecision (i.e., small sample size), and indirectness (i.e., limited population) |
| Exposure: Cannabis use (THC vs CBD not specified) | |||
| Symptom control 7 NRS N = 4,118 |
●●◌◌ Low |
Use of cannabis was associated with increased levels of mania and recurrence and lower rates of recovery and remission | Not downgraded; even though people may not be using cannabis specifically for bipolar disorder, the findings are consistent across the included studies, so we did not downgrade for indirectness in this instance |
| Quality of life and functioning 1 NRS N = 3,459 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
Cannabis use was associated with less satisfaction with life and a lower probability of having a relationship compared with no cannabis use. Cannabis use was also associated with greater work impairment and being more likely to live apart from a partner |
Downgraded 1 level each for RoB and indirectness (i.e., NRS with a population using cannabis, but not clear if using for bipolar disorder specifically)a |
| Health care utilization 1 NRS N = 144 |
●◌◌◌ Very low |
People with bipolar disorder and CUD were more likely to be prescribed conventional antipsychotics than people with bipolar disorder without CUD | Downgraded 1 level each for RoB and for indirectness (i.e., NRS with a population using cannabis, but not clear if using for bipolar disorder specifically)a |
| Safety | No evidence | ||
Note. a Inconsistency not assessed; single study only.
Abbreviations. AE: adverse event; CBD: cannabidiol; CCT: controlled clinical trial; CoE: certainty of evidence; CUD: cannabis use disorder; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach; MDD: major depressive disorder; NRS: nonrandomized study; RCT: randomized control trial; RoB: risk of bias.
Conclusions
- The evidence for cannabis and anxiety and mood disorder-related outcomes is uncertain overall. However, evidence does suggest that CBD may improve symptoms in those with anxiety, while people with bipolar disorder who use cannabis may experience poorer outcomes overall.
- More research is urgently needed to address increasing interest in cannabis use for mental health disorders.
Gaps in Evidence
- No evidence on quality of life or functioning for cannabis and anxiety disorders, nor for safety of cannabis for depressive and bipolar disorders.
- High quality, randomized studies of cannabinoids are needed to determine whether cannabis has any effects on anxiety or mood disorders.
- We identified 6 ongoing, phase 3 or 4 RCTs of cannabis in anxiety, depression, or other mood disorders expected to be completed in the coming years.
Suggested citation: Ayers C, Shaw B, Robalino S, Ward R, Yeddala S, Morasco B, Kansagara D. Cannabis for anxiety and mood disorders. The Systematically Testing the Evidence on Marijuana Project; 2025. Accessed (Month DD, YYYY). https://www.cannabisevidence.org/evidence-syntheses/anxiety_and_mood_disorders/
Publication History
| Previous Versions | Last Search Date | Publication Date |
| Surveillance 2 | April 2026 | July 2026 |
| Update 1 | May 2025 | August 2025 |
| Surveillance 1 | April 2024 | August 2024 |
| Original review | January 2023 | February 2024 |
